A New View of Gravity

[HPWepf]

A New View of Gravity

Es kann hilfreich sein, den Text in den Einstellungen des YT auf deutsch einzustellen


00:05
here since the beginning of your
00:07
organization any several of you good for
00:13
you
00:14
I feel a sort of attachment to Rocky
00:19
Mountain creation fellowship because I
00:22
thank some words of mine at a Ken Ham
00:25
seminar that I was speaking at in
00:27
Colorado
00:28
back in the 90s sometime I think we
00:32
spoke in Colorado Springs and we may
00:34
have come up here also but at any rate I
00:39
remember talking to some of the guys who
00:41
were in Ken hams
00:42
organizing committee from around here
00:44
and I was telling him how what great
00:48
things are creation science fellowship
00:52
in Albuquerque was doing it turned out
00:54
to be a really good thing and I said we
00:56
got our start by having a sign-up sheet
00:58
at a Ken Ham crusade shall I call it so
01:03
I said maybe you guys can do that too
01:05
and I think you did that and I think
01:06
that was the sort of the nucleus of your
01:11
organization is that right so anyhow I
01:16
also have a another special attachment
01:18
to Colorado because as Edie was saying I
01:21
got saved here in 1969 as a grad student
01:26
I was with LSU that we were building a
01:30
cosmic ray lab in the mountains and my
01:32
wife and I attended a small mountain
01:34
church in Dillon Colorado and those
01:37
people were instrumental in introducing
01:40
me to the Lord Jesus Christ and I got
01:43
saved in the middle of a woods all by
01:46
myself and the Lord out just outside
01:51
Frisco Colorado in July of 69 so anyhow
01:56
landed my spiritual birth and I feel a
01:58
special attachment to this place
02:03
yeah a few good things yeah this is a
02:06
great place it it feels good to be at
02:10
this altitude high and dry once more
02:12
after Chattanooga low and wet so okay
02:17
well thank you for my for your patience
02:20
with me my introductory remarks some of
02:25
you have read my book starlight and time
02:27
that was written in 1994 and in 2008 I
02:33
introduced a second cosmology it sort of
02:37
branched out in a different direction
02:38
from the same roots as the first
02:41
cosmology but that hadn't been well
02:44
publicized it's in the Journal of
02:47
creation December 2008 and it's just
02:51
part of one article and but I've been
02:56
developing that and tonight I'm going to
02:58
kind of give you the the
03:01
behind-the-scenes thing that I hadn't
03:04
mind and actually have had in mind since
03:07
two months after I got saved I've had
03:10
this view of gravity cooking on the back
03:14
burner all this time and so I'm gonna
03:18
dump it on you now so so hold on to your
03:22
hats there's gonna be some things that
03:24
are just plain hard to understand but I
03:28
can't you know I can't I can only make
03:31
them so simple and the things themselves
03:33
are just going to be strange to you so
03:37
fair warning okay a new view of gravity
03:42
helps creation cosmology it explains a
03:47
number of different things wonder why
03:50
the clicker isn't working here cosmic
03:53
microwave background microwave
03:56
background radiation you've heard of
03:58
that and how starlight got here and then
04:03
galaxies redshifts I won't really have a
04:06
chance to talk in detail about that
04:08
tonight and the pioneer space probe
04:13
anomaly it's
04:15
I'm not anomalous slowing down of space
04:19
probes that are very far outside the
04:21
solar system now and in this this new
04:26
cosmology has a lot to do with that but
04:30
I won't get much chance to talk about
04:31
that either so this new view of gravity
04:38
comes mainly from Scripture sight
04:45
scriptures to say that the heavens are a
04:48
membrane or a fabric it's a real
04:52
material and we'll get into that see
04:56
that's hard already right the heavens
04:59
that's space itself now you you can't
05:02
feel space you know you can't see space
05:06
so here I am saying it's a material a
05:10
real material that's all right it's our
05:13
first weird thing the membrane is
05:23
four-dimensional not 3-dimensional for
05:27
space dimensions and that's your second
05:30
weird thing this is that's if the first
05:32
one didn't kill you this this one will
05:34
know so I'm sorry
05:37
and then I'm suggesting based on a
05:41
couple of scriptures that this membrane
05:43
is accelerating and if you have this
05:47
kind of membrane accelerating you get
05:50
gravity and I'll show you how that
05:52
happens so first let's go back to the
05:57
very beginning and study what the
06:00
heavens are and are not the heavens are
06:06
space itself I want to convince you of
06:08
that in the beginning God created the
06:13
heavens and the earth and the earth was
06:16
formless and void and darkness was on
06:18
the face of the deep and the Spirit of
06:20
God was moving on the face of the waters
06:23
now that little word and there in the
06:28
Hebrew
06:29
is there are several types of that
06:32
conjunction in Hebrew and this use of
06:35
the word and the construction in the in
06:39
the Hebrew says that it connects it it
06:43
amplifiers that first sentence so in
06:47
other words there's another type of and
06:50
in Hebrew that talks about an action
06:53
that is consecutive that's after the
06:55
first action but this is not that type
06:58
of and this and is describing how the
07:02
earth was you could translate it now the
07:05
earth was formless and void so God made
07:08
the heavens and the earth and right
07:10
right then the earth is formless and
07:13
void and so there's the earth and I
07:17
didn't know how to draw a formless and
07:19
void thing so that's as good as I could
07:21
get but darkness was on the face of
07:25
something the deep and you can guess
07:30
that that's probably waters because
07:32
right after that there's the face of the
07:35
waters and later on and in the same
07:39
chapter you find out that the earth is
07:42
something that's way down near the
07:44
center of that big ball of water the
07:49
deep so the earth and the deep are one
07:54
thing that happened right at the
07:57
beginning but God also created something
07:59
else at that same time what's that well
08:02
you'd think it's just this stuff around
08:04
the earth and the deep the heavens okay
08:09
so he created two things and one was the
08:14
earth and the other was the heavens but
08:17
he didn't create the host of the heavens
08:19
till the fourth day the host of the
08:23
heavens are the things in it the Sun
08:26
Moon and stars so this looks like just a
08:32
big empty nothingness right the heavens
08:36
are a created nothing right
08:40
well I'm going to say scratch out the
08:43
nut the in oh they're the heavens are a
08:45
created thing and here's why here are
08:49
the scriptures that make me believe that
08:52
the heavens that the heavens are a real
08:54
material first
08:57
oh that out would rend the heavens and
09:00
come down and isaiah rend of tear it's
09:05
kind of hard to tear nothing right and
09:11
all of them the heavens will wear out
09:14
like a garment and that's Psalm 102
09:17
verse 26 you know again heart how do you
09:22
wear out on nothingness I'm going to
09:25
shake the heavens and the earth it's a
09:28
something that somehow will get shaken
09:31
that's a future event and so it talks
09:35
about an earthquake but also a heaven
09:39
quake so the heavens can get shaken
09:43
there or something the heavens will be
09:45
destroyed by burning says Peter and the
09:50
heaven was split apart like a scroll and
09:54
there's a couple of other verses that
09:56
I'll touch on in a moment that also
09:58
indicate this that it's a real material
10:02
now a lot of these are comparable to a
10:04
fabric you know tearing wearing out like
10:08
a garment so I like to talk about the
10:11
fabric of space so if so though it's an
10:16
invisible fabric that you can't feel as
10:20
you move through it and it moves through
10:22
you so this is mind-blowing isn't it
10:26
okay all I'm doing those taking those
10:30
scriptural I would say more than hints
10:33
very very seriously now there's some
10:39
science behind this idea that the
10:42
heavens or space is a material so let's
10:45
look at the science 19th century
10:48
scientists knew that space is
10:51
Tyrael James Clerk Maxwell I think
10:56
possibly the greatest theoretical
10:59
physicist in the 19th century was a
11:02
creationist and a Christian very fine
11:04
Christian and he didn't like evolution
11:07
and said so but Maxwell talked about
11:13
something called a displacement current
11:16
and it occurs in an insulator so if
11:19
those of you who are electrical EE types
11:23
you'll recognize the battery and the
11:25
resistor and a capacitor with with
11:27
plastic in it and then there's this
11:31
symbol for what Maxwell would call a
11:34
galvanometer or just an ammeter and a
11:37
switch and in plastic we know there are
11:41
what they call bound electric charges or
11:44
in molecules and atoms and think of
11:48
these as positive and negative electric
11:50
charges that are held together by a
11:52
spring okay but they're really molecules
11:56
and atoms that are springy and when you
11:59
apply an electric when you apply a
12:02
voltage to those plates it applies a
12:05
force to those electric charges and
12:08
tends to pull them apart
12:09
and that motion of charges it makes a
12:13
measurable current so electric charges
12:17
are bound together and now keep your eye
12:20
on the charges and the ammeter and the
12:26
switch okay here we go
12:29
charge is pulling apart current now the
12:32
current stops the switch is still closed
12:34
but the charges have stopped moving
12:37
they've they've gone as far as that
12:39
voltage will make them so there's no
12:43
more current so there's a surge of
12:44
current now what happens when you take
12:50
the plastic out let me just see where I
12:54
am in this
12:58
let's just take away the plastic and
13:02
we'll see that even a vacuum if we put a
13:05
vacuum between those plates even a
13:08
vacuum has a displacement current so
13:12
keep your eye on the ammeter and the
13:13
switch again little surge of current not
13:19
as much as when the plastic was there
13:21
but definitely miserable so Maxwell said
13:27
well even though it doesn't look like
13:30
there's anything there there must be
13:32
bound electric charges in the vacuum so
13:38
now I'll show those electric charges and
13:40
show the switch in the ammeter and show
13:43
those electric charges moving even
13:46
though we can't see them really okay if
13:50
you bring it up here I will stop it for
13:53
you you know I'm not quite in the 21st
13:59
century yet I don't use social media I'm
14:02
very antisocial but mr. Maxwell looked
14:10
at all this and he said I'm gonna call
14:13
that stuff the ether there was some
14:15
historical precedents but he called it
14:17
the ether and from this displacement
14:20
current he actually figured that there
14:24
would be electromagnetic waves that move
14:27
through the ether and he could calculate
14:29
their speed and that agreed with the
14:32
previously measured speed of visible
14:34
light
14:35
so he said light is probably an
14:37
electromagnetic wave
14:39
but although that's based on his his
14:42
understanding of the of the vacuum as
14:46
having something in it that it's an
14:48
invisible untouchable stuff see what I'm
14:52
saying so in the 19th century they were
14:56
pretty happy with that nobody minded
14:58
that concept but then Einstein came
15:03
along and first he discounted and then
15:08
he accepted an ether
15:11
people know about is discounting that's
15:14
in 1905 the introduction of a
15:16
luminiferous ether will prove to be
15:19
superfluous and that's a picture of him
15:22
about that age when he was young and and
15:25
more arrogant than a lot of physicists
15:28
are but he softened up a little and in
15:35
1919-20 he said this according to
15:39
general relativity space without ether
15:42
is unthinkable
15:43
so in 1905 he threw away the ether now
15:47
he's grabbing it back in 1920 why did he
15:51
do that because in 1916 he did his
15:55
general theory of relativity which talks
15:58
about gravity and talks about space as
16:01
being some kind of stuff that can be
16:03
bent you've heard of the curvature of
16:05
space and he says I'm assigning physical
16:09
properties to space itself so it's an
16:13
ether
16:13
well the academics of his day didn't
16:17
like that and so they just ignored that
16:22
now Einstein never knew he neither
16:25
withdrew those words but he didn't
16:27
repeat them he didn't push the idea so
16:30
it wasn't going to go anywhere so the
16:34
ether remained in this refute it was
16:38
sort of politically incorrect but the
16:43
ether proved to be indispensable now
16:46
here's another arrogant young physicist
16:48
named Paul Dirac arrogance is a disease
16:52
that physicists get I think we all
16:54
suffer from it so but Paul Dirac in 1930
17:00
talked about antimatter and in
17:03
particular anti electrons which were
17:05
called positrons and he said there are
17:08
holes in a vast sea an invisible sea of
17:12
electrons and you move you rip an
17:15
electron out of its usual place in the
17:18
vacuum and you leave a hole behind just
17:22
like in semiconductors some
17:23
you have heard of holes and electrons
17:25
same sort of concept well he predicted
17:29
positrons before they were discovered on
17:31
that basis and as a matter of fact later
17:36
on
17:36
Dirac see when did he write this he
17:43
wrote an article all right mr. Dirac
17:51
yeah nature to the journal Nature in
17:54
1951 the title was is there an ether and
17:57
he generally you know pretty well
18:01
answered the question yes other
18:05
physicists took him to task for that but
18:08
Dirac stuck to his guns so and then in
18:14
the 1950s there's this very nice theory
18:19
called quantum electrodynamics it's very
18:22
complicated but it's also very accurate
18:24
it's been proved to be very accurate in
18:29
its predictions and but it starts off
18:32
with the concept that space is filled
18:34
with some kind of particles and then in
18:39
1980 people started to amplify on that
18:41
and they called it the quantum vacuum
18:43
how many of you have heard of that
18:45
phrase the quantum vacuum okay so now
18:51
there have been estimates made of how
18:54
much material is in the quantum vacuum
18:57
more than 10 million metric tons of mass
19:01
not weight 10 million metric tons per
19:05
cubic centimeter at least and possibly
19:10
as much as that very large number of
19:13
metric tons per CC and I translate that
19:19
for you a quintillion is a billion
19:22
billion so it's up to 10 quintillion
19:25
quintillion quintillion quintillion
19:28
quintillion metric tons per cubic
19:31
centimeter so it sure sounds like that
19:34
stuff
19:35
is awfully massive and that's the best
19:39
theoretical physicist we have or are
19:43
talking about that so they have code
19:49
names by the way for the ether these
19:53
days for years they've been using these
19:55
it's a way to avoid this archaic
19:59
antiquated politically incorrect term
20:01
the ether so you will see this word
20:06
space-time what space-time well it's a
20:09
stuff that can be bent or the space-time
20:12
continuum
20:13
or the space-time manifold or the cosmic
20:18
substratum or the plenum or the quantum
20:22
vacuum all these are code names for the
20:26
ether okay so but an ether by any other
20:30
name is still a material ok so now let's
20:37
go back to the beginning and I'm going
20:40
to say that God spread out this material
20:42
that we're calling but he calls the
20:44
heavens so God said let there be an
20:48
expanse in the midst of the waters right
20:51
down there somewhere in the middle and
20:53
later on the earth develops in that
20:57
little carved out piece of water that's
21:00
in there but above it there's a small
21:05
empty space that apparently got bigger
21:09
and the word expanse means something
21:11
that's spread out essentially for Hebrew
21:15
in the Hebrew rakia something spread out
21:19
so I think he spread out these waters a
21:24
great deal big enough to hold all the
21:28
galaxies all the stars you with me on
21:32
that so far and then later on in the
21:35
same chapter God called the expanse or
21:39
in the King James the firmament heavens
21:43
so God spread out these this material we
21:47
call the heavens
21:48
but he also stretched the material and
21:51
we have verses like this God who
21:54
stretches out the heavens like a curtain
21:58
and spreads them out like a tent to
22:01
dwell in and that's in Isaiah and there
22:04
was a bunch of other verses like that
22:06
and it used to be that I thought that
22:10
God stretched out the heavens a great
22:12
deal but now I'm looking at what he said
22:17
he stretched it out and it's like a tent
22:19
curtain like a curtain so this is a
22:22
picture of a model actually a full-scale
22:25
model of the tabernacle of Israel in the
22:28
wilderness and it's about 15 miles north
22:32
of islet at the opening of the Red Sea
22:34
there in a small part called Timna Park
22:39
but you notice the curtains on the
22:41
tabernacle there you notice they're not
22:44
sagging they've been pulled taut so that
22:48
they won't flap so the curtains are
22:52
stretched taut so the fabric of space
22:57
God says he stretched it I think it just
23:00
means he's pulled it taut if you if you
23:02
take a towel or something and pull on it
23:05
then you've applied tension to it it
23:07
gets a smidgen longer but it doesn't
23:10
stretch out Tim fold like rubber so all
23:13
the material that God compared this
23:16
stretching to a material that wouldn't
23:18
stretch very much so now I don't think
23:20
there that he stretched out space but
23:25
that he produced the redshifts in
23:28
another way but the fabric of space has
23:32
a tension in it okay now next big
23:36
problem the heavens are four dimensional
23:40
because the verses like this one the
23:42
heavens will be rolled up like a scroll
23:45
so I made a picture of that there's the
23:48
heavens they're being rolled up like a
23:50
scroll I suppress one of the regular
23:53
space dimensions but what that means is
23:56
if you're gonna roll a piece of paper up
23:59
on the table
23:59
it has to be thin in one dimension so
24:03
the heavens are thick in all three
24:07
directions that we can see but they must
24:10
be thin in another direction that we
24:12
can't see and moreover to roll them up
24:17
requires more of that fourth direction
24:20
so there is the fourth direction arrow
24:22
and there's room you have to have room
24:27
to roll this up in the fourth direction
24:31
are you now totally that I hope you're
24:39
with me those of you who were raised on
24:42
1940s and 1950s science fiction like I
24:46
have I was you have no problem with this
24:49
but you know so but this fourth
24:53
direction the science fiction people and
24:56
now scientists also call hyperspace
25:00
now most scientists have a lot more than
25:04
four dimensions I'm not proposing 10 or
25:09
11 or 22 dimensions just one and but I'm
25:15
borrowing their term hyperspace for that
25:18
extra space that this this sheet would
25:22
exist in now also remember that this is
25:25
a future thing today the heavens must be
25:29
unrolled if he's going to in the future
25:32
roll them up so they must be almost flat
25:36
the 4th dimension is not time relativity
25:41
treats time as a dimension also but in
25:45
this case it would be a fifth dimension
25:47
and it's a different has some
25:50
differences than the other four space
25:53
dimensions so the fourth dimension is a
25:57
space dimension even though we can't see
25:59
it I think we're bound up within that
26:04
fabric and we can't look in that
26:07
correction we're not built to perceive
26:10
in that direction so but that fourth
26:13
direction allows Einstein's curved space
26:16
it allows a direction for a space to be
26:19
curved in so it makes sense of general
26:23
relativity actually so now all we have
26:26
to do is add some acceleration and we
26:29
get gravity let me illustrate this some
26:33
of you have seen this picture before
26:34
imagine a heavy iron ring sitting on a
26:42
trampoline but don't imagine it here on
26:45
earth imagine it way out in space where
26:48
there's very little gravity okay then
26:52
the ring wouldn't make a dent as you see
26:55
it here but if you accelerate that
26:57
membrane in that direction then it will
27:02
make a dent and if you put a little ball
27:06
or a small object here let's say we have
27:11
a little ball here it's going to tend to
27:14
slide toward the heavy iron ring and it
27:18
will slide faster as it gets closer so
27:23
that's how gravity behaves it's like
27:25
there's a force pulling that little ball
27:28
toward the iron ring and the force gets
27:31
stronger the closer it gets to the iron
27:33
ring so that's like gravity so it
27:37
suggests that here's a way to get
27:40
Newton's gravity and you get Newton's
27:42
gravity if you have this happening you
27:48
have an acceleration and I call it G and
27:51
that's going to turn out to be a large
27:52
number
27:53
swear it divided by the tension so
27:58
here's acceleration here's tension and
28:00
if that number happens to be four pi
28:03
times Newton's gravitational constant
28:06
then you get a fully mathematically
28:09
consistent picture of gravity you can
28:14
get on science equations of gravity from
28:16
this but you can also just plain get
28:18
Newton's equations
28:21
so so now in this membrane or whatever
28:30
think of it sort of like a something
28:33
that can't stretch much like a membrane
28:35
on a drum okay it can vibrate and it can
28:40
have waves in it and the wave speed
28:42
turns out to be the tension and divided
28:47
by the mass of that membrane itself and
28:51
then take the square root of that ratio
28:53
you now if that wave speed is the speed
28:58
of light then those equations that you
29:01
get from this picture fit
29:03
relativity so I think it is the speed of
29:07
light
29:09
now acceleration has this nice benefit
29:13
for us creationists and that is that
29:16
acceleration makes microwaves fellow
29:22
named William Unruh first found out in
29:26
76 this thing that's now called the
29:28
Unruh Hawking effect sometimes Hawking
29:32
did something that's related to it and
29:35
shows that acceleration heats particles
29:39
just in empty space if you accelerate a
29:42
particle it will get hot and so we have
29:47
the fabric of space here and we have a
29:51
particle in it that's bound in it but
29:53
everything's being accelerated so that
29:57
particle will get hot and Unruh said
30:01
that it will emit radiation and it's
30:05
called blackbody radiation I'll explain
30:07
what that is in a moment but it's
30:10
essentially microwaves and here's the
30:15
temperature that it gets to and this is
30:19
the Planck constant the reduced Planck's
30:22
constant some of you've heard of that
30:24
basic constants in physics and then
30:27
there's the acceleration and then that's
30:31
the Boltzmann constant and that
30:33
fundamental constant of course the speed
30:35
of light so you can if you know the
30:38
acceleration you can calculate the
30:39
temperature of this stuff now so if the
30:44
fabric of space is accelerating we ought
30:47
to be able to see the radiation from
30:49
that heating the fabric of space itself
30:53
in other words will get warm as it
30:57
accelerates so we should see this thing
31:02
called blackbody radiation that's
31:04
related to heat in the cosmos and we do
31:09
we observe cosmic microwave blackbody
31:13
radiation cosmic microwave background
31:16
radiation
31:19
so satellites observe microwaves coming
31:23
from all directions very uniformly and
31:26
here's one of the newer ones called the
31:29
Planck satellite and these microwaves
31:34
have a certain spectrum and that fits
31:37
the spectrum from a material that's at
31:40
2.7 to 5 degrees above absolute zero
31:44
degrees Kelvin and this red curve is a
31:49
is the calculated theoretical radiation
31:53
you would get inside let's say an oven
31:56
with black walls whose walls were at a
31:59
temperature of 2.7 etcetera degrees
32:03
Kelvin and you get a certain intensity
32:07
and you get certain frequency or
32:09
wavelength and that red line is the
32:12
theoretical calculation of of the
32:15
spectrum of microwaves that you would
32:18
see however it's also got data points in
32:21
it there's they're so tiny and the error
32:24
bars are so tiny that they fit entirely
32:27
within the red line that's what's
32:30
observed so it's a it's actually very
32:33
remarkable that there aren't any
32:35
deviations from this spectrum as you
32:38
look from one direction to the other
32:40
there they agree to two to one part in a
32:44
hundred thousand it's fantastically
32:47
accurate actually and I don't see how
32:50
the Big Bang could have any mechanism
32:53
that would generate this temperature
32:55
this uniformly for in all directions
32:59
this precisely but I think we get it
33:03
automatically so this I think is the
33:07
temperature or the fabric of space just
33:10
due to its acceleration okay this means
33:14
by the way the fabric of space has to be
33:17
very strong so there's our acceleration
33:20
G and if you calculate the acceleration
33:26
from our previous stuff if we plug in
33:29
that two point seven five two point
33:31
seven two five degrees Kelvin into that
33:37
equation we get a very large number for
33:41
the acceleration it's six point six
33:43
times ten to the twentieth meters per
33:46
second squared the acceleration of
33:49
gravity here on earth is about ten
33:51
meters per second squared so this is a
33:55
really fast acceleration and if the
34:00
acceleration is great then the tension
34:03
is great and from the equations I have
34:06
you could just calculate the tension so
34:09
there is a tension there is the
34:11
acceleration number we plug in and there
34:13
is Newton's gravitational constant and
34:15
you get a huge number one bar is about
34:21
fifteen pounds per square inch and
34:25
that's the atmospheric pressure at sea
34:27
level you have a little less up here you
34:31
have 12 I think and anyhow one bar is
34:35
our atmospheric pressure but 10 to the
34:39
45th bars so there's a huge tension in
34:43
this fabric and yet it doesn't tear so
34:49
it must be very strong so
34:53
in the new American Standard Psalm 150
34:55
says praise Him in the firmament of his
34:59
power I'm sorry that's the King James
35:03
new American Standard says praise him in
35:06
his mighty expanse
35:10
so it's mighty it's powerful it's
35:13
something very strong that God made so
35:18
it's very massive the density of that
35:21
membrane we can get from the tension and
35:23
just divide by the speed of light
35:25
squared
35:26
oh and we get five point nine times 10
35:29
to the 24th tons metric tons per CC now
35:34
do you remember the quantum vacuum this
35:38
number fits right into the quantum
35:41
vacuum the lower limit is ten to the
35:44
seventh and we've got 10 to the 24th and
35:48
then we've got Tim to the 91st on the
35:50
other side so it's actually kind of a
35:52
reasonable number according Duke a
35:55
quantum theorists now this brings up the
35:59
famous cosmological constant problem if
36:03
the vacuum the quantum vacuum is this
36:06
massive why doesn't that have
36:10
gravitational effects what isn't that
36:12
huge mass gravitate and this this is a
36:16
huge problem in physics and it's a
36:20
problem of a hundred and twenty orders
36:22
of magnitude between what quantum
36:25
physics requires for the mass of the
36:29
vacuum and what what we measure we don't
36:34
it either that mass has no gravitational
36:41
effect or it's not there so this is a
36:45
huge problem and if you read about
36:48
contradictions between quantum theory
36:50
and gravitation this is what they mean
36:53
by the cosmological constant problem the
36:56
cosmological constant is a number that's
36:58
proportional to the mass of the vacuum
37:02
so what this series says
37:05
is that the accelerating force is
37:07
uniform throughout the fabric same
37:10
number and so what that means is if you
37:13
don't have any mass on the fabric the
37:16
fabric will be flat if you don't have
37:19
any additional mass and it's only
37:22
additional mass that makes a dent so
37:26
this seems too good to be true actually
37:29
so I you know I'm sort of flabbergasted
37:33
by this one yet ok let's go back to my
37:35
2008 cosmology the waters beyond the
37:41
Stars affect us here remember those
37:44
waters that were above the expanse well
37:47
there's a Psalm Psalm 148 says praise
37:53
him highest heavens and the waters that
37:56
are above the heavens yep by the way if
38:00
you were thinking the waters above the
38:01
heavens had anything to do with the
38:03
Genesis flood those were supposed to
38:05
have collapsed so and besides these are
38:08
billions of light years away
38:10
and they're still there in the psalm
38:13
that was written after the flood so
38:15
they're still out there and I think
38:17
they're mostly ice particles now it's
38:20
not some solid shell but a very tenuous
38:26
arrangement spherical arrangement of ice
38:29
particles and maybe maybe some chunks as
38:31
big as planets that are water inside and
38:34
ice outside but but the total mass is a
38:38
lot and they have to be out further than
38:42
we can see with our telescopes to date
38:45
so that would make this diameter greater
38:47
than 24 billion light years but all all
38:51
the galaxies would be inside that but
38:54
they have an effect even though they're
38:57
way out there and they're just tenuous
38:58
spread over an enormous area at the
39:03
start of the fourth day of creation the
39:07
earth was the only matter below the
39:09
waters remember on the third day he made
39:12
the waters into the earth let the dry
39:14
land appear and the plants but no other
39:18
matter out there other than those waters
39:22
this makes for a kind of unusual gravity
39:27
situation so the the waters above are
39:32
like that ring on the trampoline that I
39:34
showed you and inside the ring it's flat
39:40
so that that would mean no gravity if
39:44
you put a ball bearing inside there
39:46
wouldn't tend to roll to one side or the
39:49
other only outside and that's what the
39:52
mutants equations of gravity say about
39:55
that situation also Einsteins but but
40:01
the waters above had to make a very deep
40:04
dent and and the mass of the water had
40:10
to be at least 20 times all the galaxies
40:13
to make that deep a dent to do the kinds
40:17
of things I'm going to tell you about
40:18
and to explain that the pioneer anomaly
40:23
so that I won't have time to tell you
40:25
about so but it has it's a lot of mass
40:28
it's 20 times the mass of all the
40:30
gravity of all the galaxies now here's a
40:34
cross section of our trampoline and the
40:37
vertical axis is also proportional to
40:41
gravitational energy per unit mass and
40:43
that has units of speed squared and
40:47
there's a certain depth of gravitational
40:52
energy 1/2 C squared for the equations
40:56
of general relativity say something very
41:00
interesting happens so here's a cross
41:03
section of our trampoline and this is
41:06
the iron ring a cross section of it
41:08
representing the waters above and a
41:10
little tiny BB somewhere at the center
41:14
making a little tiny dent but I'm
41:16
suggesting that on the at the beginning
41:19
of the fourth day of creation we were in
41:22
this situation where we were almost at
41:24
that critical potential and at that
41:26
below that critical potential the
41:29
equations appear to say that time does
41:33
not tick nothing happens no forces
41:36
nothing moves it's dark and if you were
41:41
there you wouldn't know about it so no
41:46
time nothing happens very dull okay so
41:51
during the fourth day though God created
41:54
the Stars and I'm giving a particular
41:56
scenario here where he may have created
41:59
them in a wave moving out from the earth
42:02
so keep your eye on the animation did
42:06
you see that so I'm proposing a wave of
42:11
creation now those new star maths masses
42:16
would dent the trampoline so let me show
42:19
that in animation
42:21
it was the wave of new stars going out
42:24
and it makes an additional dent a little
42:27
bit of a more of a dent in the
42:30
trampoline and you notice now that
42:33
everything in the dent has been shoved
42:35
below that timeless line wherever below
42:40
of which everything is timeless so as
42:43
soon as the new stars go out boom
42:46
everything starts dropping below that
42:50
critical gravitational potential our
42:53
gravitational energy so now but we've
42:58
got tension that God has left some
43:00
tension in this material and that's
43:04
going to tend to pull it up if you if
43:06
you have tension in your trampoline you
43:11
know you suddenly add tension to your
43:12
trampoline it's going to pull that iron
43:15
ring up as you you can imagine that I
43:19
think so let's just imagine it and do an
43:23
animation here now it was this thing
43:26
called an event horizon you see this
43:28
this arrow here that's the place where
43:32
time stops and inside of which time is
43:36
all stopped and that is
43:40
we're going to move inward as the
43:43
stretching raises that dent upward so
43:47
you okay so keep your eye over the event
43:49
horizon and on the on the trampoline as
43:52
or letting up move upward did you see
43:59
that so the event horizon has moved
44:02
inward now let's just simulate that
44:06
looking down on our stars on the on the
44:09
trampoline and so timelessness would
44:13
follow that wave of new stars so I've
44:16
already started it here this is a wave
44:18
he's actually think of those as galaxies
44:21
and inside the earth has already dropped
44:24
into the timeless zone so we're looking
44:27
down on the trampoline and you say and
44:30
we've were making a wave of stars and
44:33
behind that wave is a black zone with
44:36
nothing visible in it where time has
44:39
stopped so here you go and then it's
44:41
going to recede as the event horizon
44:46
moves inward like I showed you and then
44:50
right at the end you notice this little
44:51
green dot that's the earth last thing to
44:54
pop out so how does that affect what we
44:59
see in our cosmology
45:03
well light would follow that shrinking
45:07
sphere I colored the sphere purple just
45:10
so you could see it against the black
45:11
background but inside that sphere
45:15
there's no time and it's shrinking so
45:25
there we go so as it's shrinking light
45:31
is going to follow as each galaxy pops
45:34
out as it's shrinking light from that
45:37
galaxy moves in all directions and some
45:40
of that light's gonna try to follow the
45:42
sphere and move in with it so I'm
45:47
suggesting that earth time stopped
45:49
during the fourth day of creation
45:52
so it was a 24-hour regular day here my
46:01
clicker seems to be getting insensitive
46:03
here
46:04
starlight arrived during the fourth day
46:07
during that fourth day and whatever God
46:12
did to bring the light here it's it
46:14
looks like he brought it here during the
46:16
fourth day let there be lights in the
46:18
firmament the Sun and the moon etc the
46:21
greater light the lesser light and then
46:24
it says at the end and it was so so
46:27
whatever cosmology we have and you know
46:30
this is just one speculation mostly
46:34
whatever was the real way that God did
46:38
it he got it here in a hurry on the 4th
46:42
day so Adam could see the further parts
46:45
of our own Milky Way and our near
46:48
neighbor galaxy Andromeda and a lot of
46:51
glories in the heaven the fact he
46:53
wouldn't be able to see the nearest star
46:55
until four years later if God hadn't
46:59
done this so I think he did this just so
47:03
we could see and you get some really
47:07
good views up there in the mountains at
47:09
night I remember some gorgeous views of
47:13
the Milky Way and there wouldn't be able
47:16
to we wouldn't be able to see those even
47:18
today after six thousand years we'd only
47:21
see just a nearby piece of the Milky Way
47:24
if God hadn't arranged to get the light
47:27
here or somehow okay
47:31
the change of dint depth causes redshift
47:34
this is a December 2008 Journal of
47:37
creation and my article in there is
47:40
called new time dilation helps creation
47:43
cosmology and in that there's a little
47:46
equation that gives you the redshift
47:49
lambdas or the ratio of starting and
47:53
finishing red shifts that get to us and
47:58
the Phi's are the gravitational
48:01
potential at the star Phi one
48:04
compared to the gravitational potential
48:06
at earth and then the ratio of ours is
48:10
the expansion ratio I was allowing for
48:13
considerable expansion to produce most
48:15
of the redshift then but now I'm
48:18
thinking and if you remember some of
48:20
those animations there wasn't much
48:22
expansion the waters above the heavens
48:25
didn't move out very much at all so so
48:28
that that ratio would be just 1 so
48:32
essentially our redshifts would be do
48:34
just two gravitational potential and
48:38
this is a relativistic effect it's like
48:43
the length changes you've heard about
48:45
things getting shorter as you move
48:47
through it's sort of similar to that
48:50
it's a relativistic effect so you can
48:55
get the redshift out of that that's as
48:57
much as I have time to say here and then
49:00
the decrease of that then depth as
49:03
things move up can explain the pioneer
49:07
anomaly which is this anomalous slowing
49:12
down of space probes now that they're
49:14
way out there more of them they can can
49:18
account for with all the gravity they
49:19
you know of it's again it's a relativity
49:23
effect it's would take some time to
49:26
explain it it's in the Journal of
49:29
creation August 2007 and I'm preparing
49:33
an update for the Journal of creation
49:36
because there's been a lot of other
49:38
theories that have popped out trying to
49:41
explain the same anomaly and one has
49:44
gotten sort of popular but I have an
49:48
update on that it really looks to me
49:51
like the guy's goof somehow I I take the
49:56
numbers in their paper and plug them
49:58
into well-known equations and I get
50:02
different answers so anyhow I have an
50:07
update on that but at least this theory
50:11
seems to have a nice explanation for
50:13
that for that pioneer
50:16
so creation cosmology is answering
50:19
questions and I'll have time to answer
50:22
some of yours do we quit at 8 o'clock
50:25
sharp well we'll have time for let's say
50:30
10 minutes of questions
50:32
what causes cosmic microwaves that's the
50:35
new thing that this new wrinkle about
50:39
gravity introduces how light got here
50:43
that's in my 2008 paper redshifts
50:48
pioneer deceleration and I'm sure it's
50:52
going to answer some other interesting
50:53
things to having an extra dimension to
50:56
play with is great theoretical fun you
50:59
know so I appreciate your patience with
51:02
me and but I want you to be able to
51:05
trust the Bible to be true thank you
51:08
[Applause]
51:30
you do have time for some questions
51:33
actually before we take them I want to
51:37
well let's have the questions first and
51:40
well thank you and we give you the mic
51:48
okay do you mind
51:52
or not you don't want to come to it okay
51:56
it would be better to have the mic well
51:59
if you're recording this you you want
52:01
the question to be recorded or also have
52:04
to repeat it received by others both in
52:10
the creationist community and in the old
52:13
earth community well only creationists
52:17
have heard it so far I gave it last
52:19
month at the Creation Research Society
52:23
annual conference which was in Florence
52:27
Kentucky this year at the Creation
52:29
Museum and you're the second audience so
52:34
you can take up you can poll the
52:36
audience and ask but it has passed peer
52:39
review at the Journal of creation had
52:42
some good but tough reviewers and I had
52:46
to adjust things in my paper things that
52:50
I just kind of slough off and was lazy
52:51
and didn't develop the reviewers held my
52:54
feet to the fire and I had to explain
52:57
those things but it passed and they were
53:01
knowledgeable you can tell that by their
53:04
their understanding they're quite
53:06
competent reviewers how others take it I
53:11
don't know we'll see but you're in at
53:14
the beginning of the new this new view
53:16
of gravity that is there hasn't been
53:19
much comment on that 2008 article I
53:23
think it's too technical
53:27
and it hasn't been publicized I haven't
53:30
tried to publicize it another question
53:43
I have four questions I don't know if
53:47
you can get to all of them I'll just ask
53:51
all four of them and you can decide how
53:53
you want to answer okay first question
53:55
is on the cosmic microwave background
53:57
radiation I've always seen these maps of
54:01
the sky that they make and they draw
54:03
these contour lines on them
54:05
implying that it isn't as even
54:09
directionally as as you were saying with
54:11
those error those tiny error bars maybe
54:14
maybe we should stop and answer these
54:16
one by one okay better the contour maps
54:19
show differences of one one hundred
54:22
thousandth of a degree next question is
54:30
can you relate your new theory to the
54:36
things that they are seeing that have
54:39
caused them to want to invent dark
54:41
matter and dark energy yes I think so I
54:45
think in fact this theory will probably
54:48
do away with any need for dark matter it
54:53
will explain the things that seem to be
54:58
explained by dark matter in a different
55:00
way and that's my you know you know
55:03
first scoping of of that question but
55:10
the wrinkles that they see these small
55:13
perturbations can have other
55:16
explanations than the ones they're
55:18
invoking and and you can explain the
55:21
same general features of the data that
55:25
way the next one is car Meli's
55:35
accelerated space-time theory of the
55:38
early 1990s he first kind of came up
55:41
with that can you kind of relate because
55:44
it sounds to me like you and he were
55:46
saying something very similar yeah John
55:48
Hartnett was an advocate of that well
55:55
hartnett and Carmela's theory imagine
55:59
space-time as being greatly stretched
56:02
out but they also said the one key new
56:08
thing in the theory was that at the time
56:11
you start stretching it out right at the
56:15
center time would take a lot slower so
56:22
that was a new kind of time dilation but
56:25
that was an acceleration in the
56:27
expansion so to speak it's not an
56:30
acceleration in a forth direction so by
56:35
the way John Hartnett is the one who
56:39
made me realize that God said he
56:42
stretches out space like a tent curtain
56:46
and tent curtains aren't very elastic
56:48
and they don't stretch out ten fold you
56:51
would need at least a 10 fold expansion
56:54
of space to explain the redshifts of
56:56
distant galaxies and he said the
56:59
material that God compared the
57:01
stretching - wasn't that stretchable so
57:05
he convinced me so both John and I now
57:09
don't think there was a huge expansion
57:11
of space which means that Carmela's
57:17
picture looks like it goes out you know
57:20
all together that's right I haven't
57:22
asked you on that no you still believe
57:24
in karma legs so I need to ask
57:33
yeah yeah that's what he said
57:36
my last question has to do with a
57:38
pioneer anomaly will you allow that yeah
57:42
because I I was trying to get a handle
57:45
on what you had written several years
57:47
ago about the pioneer anomaly and and
57:49
after reading it I wasn't completely
57:52
clear whether you had concluded that
57:55
that the the deceleration of those
57:58
probes was actually a real deceleration
58:02
or was it or was it an artifact of the
58:04
telemetry due to some other relativistic
58:08
fact does yet conclusion still hold now
58:13
I am more firm back then yes you're
58:18
quite right you that's very perceptive
58:20
of you to see that what I showed
58:24
rigorously was that we would measure a
58:27
deceleration with the radar pulses going
58:31
back and forth between the probe but the
58:34
question is is that a real deceleration
58:37
now I think it is but I'm still a little
58:41
bit queasy about that the telemetry but
58:47
now you're concluding that it's possibly
58:49
did I say that back in 2007 that it was
58:52
just an artifact
58:53
well you didn't explicitly say it that's
58:55
why I was kind of asking the question
58:57
yeah because I wasn't I was I wasn't
59:00
real sure so I was I hedged I just I
59:05
just stuck to the measurement and didn't
59:07
try to say whether it was a real
59:09
deceleration or not but now I think it
59:11
is and if it is then it has the
59:14
potential for explaining the the tight
59:18
orbits of stars in our galaxies you know
59:22
that's one reason they invoke dark
59:24
matter is they say there must be some
59:26
additional matter pulling on those on
59:28
those stars to make them follow the
59:31
tight orbits rather than looser orbits
59:33
for their speeds and but if if it's a
59:37
real deceleration and it's a real force
59:41
and and it's just about the right order
59:44
of magnitude to explain the galaxy
59:48
orbits so we may be able to explain
59:50
galaxies without dark matter with this
59:54
but I haven't gotten into that and
59:56
there's some lots of ifs ands and buts
59:58
that I keep stumbling over so that's
60:02
just future work
60:34
why they're seeing that as a wild
60:36
coincidence I haven't seen that new
60:38
scientist article you could you amplify
60:40
it why they said that I'll be happy to
60:42
forward that to you okay no I I'm not I
60:45
have an idea it's talking about that
60:47
same maybe it's talking about a new
60:53
attempt at explaining the cosmological
60:55
constant problem and why all that matter
60:59
and in the vacuum doesn't gravitate so
61:03
it's it's kind of sounds like it's one
61:06
of those explanations there have been a
61:08
lot of attempts I mean it's the hugest
61:11
numerical problem in physics 120 orders
61:16
of magnitude can you imagine that one
61:19
with 120 zeros after it
61:21
let's see my answer is this and I was
61:24
only one with 120 zeros after a factor
61:29
wrong and then dr. Humphreys also thank
61:37
you for the code words for ether that
61:39
was amazing I'd never noticed that and
61:42
then your theory of gravity and what
61:46
happened on day four are they coupled or
61:49
could they be decoupled or are they you
61:52
get them either both or one or the other
61:54
I think you could I mean they they are
62:01
both but I'd have to think about the
62:05
rest of that question certainly having
62:08
that trampoline picture in your head
62:11
made it easy to present how light got
62:14
here so they're connected
62:21
so yeah anyone else
62:33
I switch the subject a little bit to
62:36
mercury I've read an article recently it
62:39
may be like physics today or whatever it
62:42
was trying to explain how the mercury
62:51
sounds like they're still scratching
62:53
their heads about the strange situation
62:55
there and the magnetic moment is
63:00
decreasing rapidly like you predicted
63:01
could you comment on that okay yes that
63:05
theory I haven't had a chance to go
63:07
through it carefully but it looks like a
63:09
new variation on the Dynamo theory that
63:13
I critiqued in the last International
63:16
Conference on creationism I had a long
63:19
critique you'll get a hint of where I
63:22
was going with it but its title what did
63:25
I call it
63:25
I said planetary magnetic dynamo
63:29
theories a century of failure because
63:34
they have been working on them for
63:36
almost a century and I analyzed the most
63:39
popular the best analytical theory that
63:42
they've got and found that the earth is
63:48
several orders of magnitude short of
63:50
being able to even consider having a
63:53
dynamo work to maintain the Earth's
63:56
magnetic field so mercury which rotates
63:59
much slower than the earth and has a
64:01
smaller core should have even less of a
64:06
chance of having a working dynamo
64:08
because the spin the rate of spin of the
64:12
planet or the core has a lot to do with
64:15
the dynamo theory so mercury if Earth's
64:19
Earth's core can't have a dynamo looks
64:23
like mercury can't have a dynamo either
64:25
so whatever new wrinkle they put on
64:28
their non-working theory I have doubts
64:31
that they will have any real good
64:33
explanation
64:35
with their billions of years idea that
64:37
they expected mercury to have absolutely
64:40
nothing that's right
64:42
yeah there's Maine they've fallen really
64:44
short on the mercury so by the way the
64:50
latest space probe measurements show
64:53
magnetized lava near Mercury's North
64:58
Pole and is strongly magnetized
65:01
it had to be a field ten times stronger
65:03
than today and that's upsetting for the
65:07
Dynamo theorists and then it's reversed
65:11
so it looks like mercury has managed to
65:14
reverse its magnetic field at least once
65:17
so we're having a lot of fun with
65:21
mercury I am and the other guys too I
65:23
think this is the matter issue in the
65:31
fabric of space that just is just so
65:34
bizarre to me how do you explain having
65:36
all that extra matter it without having
65:40
a gravitational field i I just don't
65:42
grasp that can you okay give us a little
65:44
bit more detail number of the trampoline
65:46
yeah and the trampoline sitting out in
65:48
space
65:50
well better better yet imagine just a
65:53
sheet of fabric okay and there let's say
65:57
there's pressure on the bottom of the
66:00
sheet so there's a uniform force per
66:02
unit area on the sheet okay so if it's
66:07
uniform then the sheet will accelerate
66:10
at the same rate everywhere and there
66:12
won't be any dents in it are you with me
66:15
better yeah okay so it doesn't matter
66:18
how much the sheet weighs how much mass
66:20
is in the sheet okay so no no dents only
66:26
when you put an additional piece of
66:28
matter on the sheet will there be a dent
66:31
so it's only additional matter that
66:34
makes gravity not the mass of the sheet
66:37
itself okay now so when this all
66:42
happened did the acceleration occur on
66:44
day four or is it a continuous
66:46
accelerate I think it's a continuous
66:48
Excel
66:50
otherwise we'd be floating so it's
66:54
what's holding you to do the ground okay
66:58
just that we were feeling according to
67:02
this theory a tiny fraction of that
67:06
enormous acceleration in the fourth
67:09
dimension due to the Earth's having bent
67:12
the fabric of space just a little bit
67:15
and so we're feeling a little bit of
67:17
that and okay okay I'm not following it
67:23
okay maybe what I should say is there's
67:27
a gonna be a paper in the journal of
67:30
creation and I think it's this December
67:32
issue that's coming up where I discuss
67:34
all these things and maybe seeing it in
67:36
print will make it a little less
67:38
slippery okay I'll wait for come on one
67:41
more question yeah if these things are
67:45
true does that change the relationship
67:47
between matter and energy you know we've
67:49
got our equations where we've got
67:52
spinning bodies and conservation of mass
67:54
and conservation of angular momentum
67:56
momentum and we always balance that
67:57
against the energy are we does the
68:00
energy equation still work yeah no no
68:04
change sir you're accelerating something
68:07
yeah without having it sell eration
68:12
takes a photo say yeah if you put the
68:15
pedal to your metal in the car
68:17
those physics still work in your car
68:20
yeah okay but you know an accelerating
68:24
body requires energy
68:26
yes celery that force is putting energy
68:29
into it there's energy involved yes okay
68:33
and where is it coming from well you
68:36
don't want to know the answer I do give
68:39
it in my okay here it goes
68:44
hold on to your seats you know if that
68:51
acceleration were all linear in one
68:53
direction then in 6,000 years
68:57
it's such a huge acceleration we would
68:59
have gone an awful long distance
69:01
in that hyperspace okay
69:05
now maybe God made hyperspace that big I
69:09
don't know but it seems to me that it's
69:11
more likely that it's it's actually a
69:16
rotation effect that you know we've got
69:20
in our hyperspace direction we've got an
69:24
acceleration that way if we have a
69:26
transverse speed in some other direction
69:30
perpendicular to that and that will be
69:33
like a rotation so now this is where
69:38
it's going to get hard I think it's a
69:41
rotation in the time direction relative
69:49
time according to the equations of
69:52
general relativity is that the past in
69:55
the future exists so though our fabric
69:58
is not just space its space-time it's
70:02
and though we just see a narrow slice of
70:05
the time word direction we seem to be
70:08
moving through it but according to this
70:13
interpretation of time the future exists
70:18
in the past exists there there and so we
70:22
can have a rotation in that direction we
70:25
can have you imagine a great wheel
70:28
rotating and the rotation of the wheel
70:31
is our fabric of space our fabric of
70:34
space is now the hub of that wheel and
70:36
and and the velocity is carrying us
70:42
around but there's an acceleration a
70:46
centripetal acceleration so we if you
70:50
have your and and that way it works out
70:54
that the tension in the fabric is the
70:58
force that does the acceleration if you
71:00
there's a nice little mechanical
71:02
engineering problem you can do of a
71:04
rotating elastic rim of a wheel you can
71:09
you configure the tension and the speed
71:11
and
71:12
turns out that the thing that's doing
71:14
the centripetal acceleration is the
71:16
tension but the energy is coming from
71:19
the wheel or from that velocity of
71:23
rotation so there's lots of other
71:27
interesting things there are two
71:29
scriptures that hint at this that I know
71:32
of
71:33
but I really didn't want to get into
71:36
that in great detail but I do in the
71:38
journal creation article in the last
71:41
section talk about this possible
71:44
possibility that the acceleration is
71:47
centripetal and I show a picture of uh
71:50
of the Wheel of Time so so ok you asked
71:57
for it
71:58
sorry okay what's going on let's see one
72:11
is in James of all places and if any of
72:21
you have a Greek New Testament you can
72:23
validate this what I'm about to tell you
72:25
you have one okay well look this one up
72:31
when you get home okay James chapter 3
72:38
this is uh looks like the King James the
72:42
tongue is a fire a world of iniquity
72:45
so as the tongue amidst our members that
72:47
it defile with the whole body and
72:49
setteth on fire the course of nature and
72:52
is set on fire of hell now set the
72:58
course of nature is kind of a pretty
73:02
loose translation of what it says you
73:08
Greek scholars it says to us Tess
73:12
trochus tastes Canisius the wheel of
73:19
Genesis the wheel of Genesis or the
73:22
wheel of generations
73:24
you know it's very interesting you know
73:26
why would he say that if he meant the
73:29
course of nature and why didn't he just
73:31
say the course of nature plenty of good
73:33
ways to say that and Greek
73:35
what's this wheel business and then the
73:39
other is back in Samuel 1st Samuel
73:51
always terrible looking through someone
73:53
else's Bibles all those nice marks you
73:56
put in them aren't there
74:06
okay
74:19
maybe you can help me it's the place
74:21
where David meets Abigail and the wife
74:25
of the fool named Mabel what chapter is
74:30
that
74:46
that sounds right okay oh yes oh here it
74:52
is
74:57
verse 29 of chapter 24 I mean 25 like
75:02
you said this is Abigail speaking to
75:06
David says yet a man is risen to pursue
75:10
thee to seek thy soul but the soul of my
75:13
Lord shall be bound in the bundle of
75:15
life with the Lord thy God and the soles
75:19
of thine enemies then shall he sling out
75:22
as of the middle of a sling soles
75:28
there's the soles of his enemies being
75:29
slung out so I kind of wonder if that's
75:33
what God is going to do with unbelievers
75:37
they just will get disattached from the
75:40
fabric of space and but of course of
75:47
course abigail was referring and I'm
75:50
sure what was on her mind regardless of
75:53
what the Spirit was saying what was on
75:55
her mind is probably she was making a
75:58
comparison to David's killing Goliath
76:01
and then saying all David's enemies will
76:04
be like that sling stone but there's a
76:07
reason why the Spirit of God included
76:10
that interesting little phrase there so
76:13
and there's all sorts of phrases for
76:16
Jesus said people will be cast out into
76:21
the outer darkness you know so there's
76:25
an outer darkness there must be an inner
76:27
something that's not darkness maybe but
76:30
cast out well if you just let them go
76:33
like a sling stone you've really cast
76:35
them there so but you know this is I
76:39
wish I had more to go on about the
76:42
acceleration and whether it's simple or
76:45
not there that's that's the once part of
76:48
my theory that's problematic the thing
76:52
that attracts me to the theory is that
76:53
it explains five
76:56
rather intriguing mysteries about
76:59
gravity that we've had and one of them
77:01
was this was this grab the cosmological
77:08
constant problem but there's several
77:11
others like why is it why is
77:14
gravitational mass the same as inertial
77:17
mass why does a inertial mass appear to
77:20
do the same thing as gravity well this
77:23
whole theory depends on inertial mass
77:26
the the power of mass to resist
77:29
acceleration so there's three other
77:35
interesting myths mysteries so but you
77:37
can tune in to my journal of creation
77:40
and paper in December and I'll go into
77:44
great detail about that question I don't
77:52
know about everybody else but I'm gonna
77:54
have to watch that presentation several
77:56
times for lava starts to sink in so I'm
77:58
going to ask you a relatively simple
78:00
question unless you have an objection to
78:02
that I don't have an I don't have an
78:04
objection at all it's up there in the
78:07
computer and you guys can do what you
78:09
want with it okay
78:11
no no strings attached to it okay just
78:15
don't tear it into little shreds and
78:17
make fun of me with it okay when you
78:21
talk during a presentation you showed a
78:24
a video depiction of the beginning when
78:28
I understand there are more than one Big
78:30
Bang Theory does this disprove the Big
78:34
Bang Theory
78:35
can you list the however may there are
78:37
right now and what designed to subscribe
78:39
to at this point I think there's a
78:41
hesitation and I don't know remember
78:43
what else
78:44
so does this disprove that you mean my
78:48
new theory yes well kind of hard for a
78:52
theory to disprove another theory but
78:54
yes you know it's just the Battle of
78:56
words but yeah I think the big the
79:02
inflation form of the Big Bang you've
79:05
heard of inflationary big
79:07
very very rapid inflation of space in a
79:11
very short time that's to solve certain
79:14
problems that they have but it predicts
79:17
that there will be 30 times more matter
79:20
in the universe than we see and so
79:24
that's called the dark matter problem or
79:26
they can have some of that be dark
79:28
energy pretty much the same stuff but
79:31
they haven't found the dark matter so
79:33
this would do away with the need for
79:37
dark matter altogether so it kind of
79:40
just like cuts out one of the pegs
79:43
underneath and then we're also it also I
79:48
think provides a better explanation for
79:49
the cosmic microwave background
79:51
radiation why why should it be that
79:55
uniform from all directions you if
79:58
you've got a big exploding ball of
80:00
plasma and we're seeing the redshifted
80:03
remnants of that why why isn't that
80:06
plasma more ragged you know explosions
80:10
don't tend to be nice and regular have
80:13
the same temperature all over you know
80:16
so yes sir
80:25
recently hawking said something about if
80:29
you had gravity you can create the
80:32
universe with just gravity it seems to
80:35
me what you're saying is gravity was
80:37
created on one of these days is that was
80:43
gravity always there it had to be
80:44
created at some point well it's related
80:49
to bands may have changed but it's just
80:52
from the fact that the Spirit of God was
80:54
moving on the face of the waters and
80:56
darkness was on the face of the deep or
80:59
above and the fact that the deep had a
81:02
surface all of those point to gravity
81:05
existing right then but it may have been
81:09
less and the tension may have been less
81:12
on that day than it was later he might
81:16
have only on the the same same day he
81:20
was spreading out to heaven spreading
81:22
like a tent he may have been stretching
81:24
it out applying more attention so that
81:27
would change gravity so gravity might
81:30
have been different on the first day
81:32
that on the second and remaining days as
81:37
well yeah so I don't know the journal
81:48
article well I don't think it'll solve
81:52
that one so to solve that one I
81:54
he'd have to tell me of whether or not
81:56
he changed the acceleration as well as
81:59
the tension he might tell me that's all
82:06
baloney or else I don't know if this is
82:12
quite appropriate to ask but would you
82:14
say that John Hartnett is distancing
82:17
himself from his own theory and uh you
82:21
know attributing I need I need to really
82:24
ask him that but it seems like since
82:26
he's done away with the great expansion
82:29
that the carmely theory had was
82:32
essentially built upon right
82:34
if that didn't happen I think he is
82:37
moving away from that but I need to ask
82:40
him that right thank you all right let's
82:46
give dr. Humphreys another hand please
Englisch (automatisch erzeugt)



MasterClass
Anzeige
masterclass.com
GET OFFER